miedo en el deporte
Overcoming fear in sports using behavioral modification

In sports there are many situations that can produce fear in the athlete and this emotional response can be elicited by diverse factors (personal, social, etc.). Consequently, we face an immense variety – as it so happens with anything that moves on a psychological plane – and this represents a great challenge if we seek to manage this fear in our athletes.

This fear can become an obstacle for our athlete’s learning process, rehabilitation program or overall athletic performance. That’s why we must find the most effective method to modulate the affective response. To do so, we’ll turn our attention to behavioral modification techniques, more specifically: systematic desensitization and prolonged exposure.

Systematic desensitization and prolonged exposure

During the 70s, cognitive-behavioral techniques experienced an exponential growth in psychotherapy. Therefore they were applied to different contexts, including sports. The goal was to enhance an optimal mental state in the athletes to improve their performance levels. Anxiety management techniques quickly became relevant to help overcome fear in sports.

In this sense, techniques such as the systematic desensitization (Wolpe, 1968) and prolonged exposure proved their worth. They’re both heavily influenced by Mowrer’s two-factor theory (1947) which explains the process of avoidance learning: fear is acquired by classic conditioning and maintained by means of avoidance and escape behaviors (Foa, 2011).

Main difference between both techniques is that SD includes a personalized hierarchy of feared situations and the individual faces each situation progressively using visualization and imagination. During prolonged exposures, on the other hand, individuals face the feared stimulus in real life.

Both techniques rely on two premises: extinction of the fear response (the initial response of the individual will tend to disappear after prolonged and repeated exposure to the stimulus), impeding escape or avoidance behaviors to facilitate extinction learning.

How does this apply to real-life situations

Summarizing these behavioral modification techniques in a few paragraphs might lead you to believe this is easy to perform in real-life settings… but you couldn’t be further from the truth. The reality is that this is quite complex and requires supervision from a specialized professional. The best way to help in the most extreme cases is to derive your athlete to a clinical psychologist.

However, there are some common guidelines that can be useful for everyday situations that may arise with our athletes (at any level of expertise). So I’ll detail those that may help overcome fear in sports.

Hierarchy of feared situations

The best way to understand this is using a real-life example: my mom! As many other women, she’s developed an irrational fear of doing box jumps. She’s physically capable of doing it but right when she’s about to lift her feet off the ground she stops in her tracks.

After several failed attempts, it was quite obvious that it wasn’t happening. So I askd myself: is there something else she might be willing to jump? Maybe 40 cm are too many and a 5-kg bumper plate seems more achievable. We progressively started piling up bumpers until we ran into that fear-avoidance pattern again.

So I shifted my focus and wondered if she’d be able to step up to the box or perform a jump alternating her feet. She wasn’t confident about jumping but she did manage to step up to the box (I stood there beside her just in case but she didn’t need me).

She started practicing 10-15 minutes after every session (repeated exposure) until one day she finally jumped. She alternated her feet but it was still an amazing achievement. Not only because it meant she was progressing in her athletic development but also because it boosted her self-confidence.

Impeding escape/avoidance

On paper, theory works wonders. However, there’s something we should be taking into consideration: who enjoys deliberately experiencing fear? As humans, we’re bound to two general principles that guide our behavior: approach pleasure and avoid pain. Therefore, we tend to escape from aversive situations. And this is exactly what we mustn’t allow.

Let’s see how this “avoidance learning” works with another example. Here’s a soccer player who tore her ACL performing a change of direction and has been inactive for the last 8 months. When she’s allowed to begin her training again, she experiences fear when faced with drills that involve change of direction and she actively avoids them.

This is how it works (figure 1): when she must perform a dribbling exercise, she starts to experience anxious symptomatology because she tore her ACL changing direction and she’s scared of relapsing. Anxiety is so intense that she’s unable to complete the drill and skips it. Escaping the situation brings her anxiety levels down, acting as negative reinforcement (to learn more about this concept, read this post).

fear in sports
Figure 1: example of how we process fear in avoidance learning

We’re trying to break this contingency through which changes of direction indicate the presence of danger (relapsing).

Our job is to “force” her to complete the exercise and re-evaluate the situation in a safe setting. Once she performs enough changes of direction without suffering any injuries, she’ll realize there was nothing to fear.

Recap

Fear in sports is a given so we must dedicate our efforts to finding the best way to manage this emotional response. In this article, I consider the possibility of using behavioral modification techniques which can be broken down into three key aspects:

  1. Listing fear situations according to their similarity to the original situation. This is especially helpful when anxiety levels are too high to expose the athlete from the get-go.
  2. Impeding escape/avoidance behaviors to break the contingency. They must learn that feared stimulus doesn’t predict danger or pain.
  3. Prolonged and repeated exposure to ensure full extinction of the conditioned response.













- Chirivella, Enrique Cantón. "La Psicología del Deporte como profesión especializada." Papeles del Psicólogo 31.3 (2010): 237-245.
- Ezquerro, M. (2008). Intervención psicológica en el deporte: revisión crítica y nuevas perspectivas. In V Congreso de la Asociación Española de Ciencias del Deporte. León.
- Foa, E. B. (2011). Prolonged exposure therapy: past, present, and future. Depression and anxiety.
- Mowrer, O. (1947). On the dual nature of learning—a re-interpretation of" conditioning" and" problem-solving.". Harvard educational review.
- Wolpe, J. (1968) Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Conditional Reflex 3,234–240
teaching crossfit
Teaching CrossFit by using behavioral techniques

Human beings are born with a repertoire of innate behaviors as a result of millions of years of evolution. They’ve been hardwired into our brains to ensure our survival throughout the years. However, once we actually start interacting on planet Earth, we begin to learn a whole bunch of different skills.

This learning process is quite basic and it doesn’t really change as we fully develop into adults (yes, this means old dogs can learn new tricks). Understanding how human beings learn and acquire new behaviors can be quite useful for those of us who’ve decided to make a living out of teaching CrossFit.

In this article we’ll be talking about two behavioral techniques reinforcement and punishment system and the shaping method – both of which can help us teach our athletes how to sharpen their tools and broaden their fitness in the process.

1 – Reinforcement vs. punishment

As active agents in our environment we can manipulate certain stimuli to elicit a desired effect, which can be to increase or reduce the chances of an individual repeating certain behaviors. This is how reinforcement and punishment can be used as teaching methods. It’s actually very common when teaching CrossFit but it should be noted that there’s a right way to do it.

First of all, when we say “positive” or “negative” we’re referring to either “providing a stimulus” or “withdrawing a stimulus”, respectively. On the other hand, if we say “reinforcement” or “punishment”, we wish to increase or decrease the chances of an individual repeating their behavior.

  • Positive reinforcement: this is the good ‘ol “here’s something you like cause you did something good”. We provide the athlete with an appetitive stimulus to try and get them to repeat their behavior. Any form of positive feedback after an athlete executed a training session at the desired level is an example of positive reinforcement.
  • Negative reinforcement: this means we withdraw an unenjoyable stimulus to reward a certain behavior. For example, imagine you programmed 8 intervals on the assault bike but your athlete is crushing the paces you wrote out and you decide to give them the opportunity to skip the 8th interval if they manage to stay consistent on the 7th.
  • Positive punishment: this one is pretty much a given in any CrossFit affiliate around the world… or haven’t you ever been hit with penalty burpees? Leaving unattended barbells rolling around the floor or being late to class are things we don’t want our athletes doing so we gladly provide them with something as aversive as the burpee (although I must confess I love burpees and don’t think of them as punishment).
  • Negative punishment: this means that you withdraw something the athlete enjoys as punishment for unwanted behavior. For example, if the athlete’s late for class and misses the warm-up, the coach may decide to leave him out for that session because he’d mess up the class flow for the rest of the members.

2 – The shaping method

The shaping method is based on gradual reinforcement of successive approximations to a pre-established goal behavior. When teaching CrossFit, this behavioral technique can be applied for any and every progression drill we would normally use to learn how to snatch, do a muscle-up or an air squat.

Executing movements in CrossFit hitting all points of performance can only rest on a solid foundation. We look for exquisite movement patterns in our athletes before we move to the coveted “high-intensity” variable.

teaching crossfit
Figure 1: Minimizing risk and maximizing efficiency. Source: CrossFit L1 Training Guide.

Shaping programs are ideal when it comes to translating one of CrossFit’s greatest teachings to real-life situations (see figure 1) by using this method to guarantee excellent mechanics.

First, we choose a goal movement (clean & jerk, handstand walk, pull-up, etc.) and then we program a series of successive approximations to pave the road towards the end goal. Every time the athlete hits a milestone, we reinforce.

As the athlete progresses, we withdraw previous reinforcement. Ergo, the athlete will have to complete more difficult movement sequences in order to receive reinforcement as time goes on.

In order for the shaping method to be truly effective, the coach must be knowledgeable enough to identify execution errors and provide corrective cues for each case. These aspects will determine the affective valence of our feedback – positive, negative or corrective – (Carmona et. al, 2015).

Imagine one of the athletes at your affiliate doesn’t have a strict pull-up yet. The end goal is that non-kipping pull-up so we take a look at our progression drills and decide to have the athlete navigate through isometric bar holds, scapular pull-ups, ring rows with elevated feet, eccentric pull-ups, so on and so forth.

Once the athlete is able to hold onto the bar for more than 30″, you reinforce; once the athlete manages to perform scapular pull-ups with proper technique, you reinforce; and you continue in that fashion while simultaneously withdrawing reinforcement from previous steps. Throughout the process you provide negative or corrective feedback to avoid inadequate movement patterns because our focus must always be on enforcement of proper pull-up mechanics (scapular retraction, activated lats and core, etc.)

teaching crossfit
Nat Díez (@nat10p) at a CrossFit seminar. Source: ikopbphotographer.com

“If, as a coach, you don’t seek continuing education, don’t be a coach.”

Nat Diez

In the end, one of the most satisfying consequences of teaching CrossFit is that it often transcends the physical aspect. Not only do we aim to improve quality of life, we also teach values – which ultimately casts a larger shadow than we acknowledge -.

We must own up to that responsibility and avoid settling in on our present know-how. As representatives of a scientific-based training methodology we’re subject to constant renewal of our skill-set as coaches. That’s why we’re asked to re-up our coaching credentials every now and again.

This doesn’t mean you should start using reinforcements and punishments like there’s no tomorrow cause you read it on some blog or that you should drastically change your teaching style. It’s a lot easier than all that: drink from every fountain of knowledge you can find and thrive to offer your best version to those who enter your affiliate looking for their own.













Carmona, D., Guzmán, J. F., & Olmedilla, A. (2015). Efectos de un programa de formulación de objetivos y moldeamiento del pase en jóvenes jugadores de fútbol. Revista de psicología del deporte24(1), 81-88. 
enseñar crossfit
Enseñar CrossFit usando técnicas de psicología conductual

El ser humano nace con una serie de conductas innatas que son el resultado de millones de años de evolución y su principal función es la de asegurar nuestra supervivencia. Pero en nuestra andadura por la Tierra, vamos aprendiendo otra serie de habilidades.

La manera en que se produce este aprendizaje sigue un proceso bastante básico que se mantiene desde que somos bebés hasta que somos adultos (sí, un perro viejo puede aprender nuevos trucos). Conocer los pormenores del proceso de aprendizaje en el ser humano puede ser útil a la hora de enseñar CrossFit.

En este artículo vamos a hablar de dos técnicas de aprendizaje – el sistema de refuerzo y castigo y el moldeamiento por aproximaciones sucesivas – que nos pueden ayudar a enseñar a nuestros atletas a adquirir y consolidar ciertas conductas en su repertorio conductual.

1 – Sistema de refuerzos y castigos

Ciertos estímulos pueden ser manipulados para que consigamos incrementar o reducir la probabilidad de aparición de una conducta en otros. Esta es la piedra angular del archiconocido sistema de refuerzos y castigos. Muchas veces se usa al enseñar CrossFit pero es importante que sepamos cómo funciona para aplicarlo de forma adecuada.

Primero debemos especificar que al decir “positivo” o “negativo” a lo que nos referimos es a “dar un estímulo” o a “quitar un estímulo”, respectivamente. Por otra parte, cuando hablamos de “refuerzo” o “castigo”, queremos incrementar la probabilidad de aparición de una conducta (refuerzo) o reducir esa probabilidad (castigo).

  • Refuerzo positivo: consiste básicamente en dar un estímulo agradable al deportista para elevar la probabilidad de aparición de una conducta. Un ejemplo muy típico es valorar positivamente su ejecución técnica en un movimiento con un “muy bien, ¡así se hace!”
  • Refuerzo negativo: esto sería quitar un estímulo desagradable para premiar una conducta en el deportista. Por ejemplo, en un principio teníamos programados 8 intervalos de assault air bike pero vemos que está cumpliendo a la perfección los ritmos que se le han propuesto y se le dice que si en el 7º intervalo vuelve a cumplir el objetivo, se le quita el último intervalo. Vamos, que le quito algo que le disgusta como premio por hacer las cosas bien.
  • Castigo positivo: este quizá sea el más común en los boxes de todo el mundo… y es que ¿a quién no le han caído burpees como castigo alguna vez? Dejar el material sin recoger o llegar tarde son conductas que queremos eliminar en nuestros deportistas. Por eso, les damos un estímulo tan desagradable como son los burpees (aunque debo confesar que a mí me encantan y no lo considero un castigo).
  • Castigo negativo: esta técnica consiste en quitarle algo que le gusta al deportista como castigo por una conducta que queremos evitar. Por ejemplo, si llega tan tarde que se pierde el calentamiento, el coach puede decidir dejarle fuera de esa sesión porque su inclusión rompería el ritmo de la clase.

2 – Moldeamiento por aproximaciones sucesivas

“El moldeamiento consiste en el reforzamiento por aproximaciones sucesivas a las cadenas de conducta necesarias para lograr una conducta objetivo (Carmona et. al, 2015)”. Para enseñar CrossFit, esta técnica conductual tiene gran aplicación si pensamos en cualquiera de las progresiones que empleamos habitualmente para aprender a hacer un snatch, un muscle-up o un air squat.

Ejecutar los movimientos en el CrossFit con la destreza y maestría óptimas requiere de la obtención de fundamentos básicos. Buscamos automatizar ciertos patrones de movimiento desde sus elementos más simples para después introducir la alta intensidad.

enseñar crossfit
Figura 1: fórmula para minimizar riesgo y maximizar eficiencia. Fuente: CrossFit L1 Training Guide

Los programas de moldeamiento son idóneos para trasladar una de las grandes enseñanzas del CrossFit a la práctica (ver figura 1).

Consiste en elegir una conducta meta (clean & jerk, handstand walk, pullup, etc.) y programar una serie de conductas previas – que van incrementando según dificultad – para pautar el progreso hacia el objetivo. El alcance de cada conducta previa se refuerza usando el refuerzo positivo y negativo.

A medida que el deportista va cumpliendo estas conductas previas, se van retirando los refuerzos. Es decir, para que el atleta obtenga el refuerzo deberá ir completando secuencias del movimiento cada vez más complejas.

La premisa fundamental para que el moldeamiento resulte eficaz es que el entrenador tenga los conocimientos necesarios para identificar errores técnicos y sepa aplicar acciones correctivas adecuadas para cada uno. A partir de ahí, se da el feedback positivo, negativo y/o correctivo según corresponda (Carmona et. al, 2015).

Imaginad que os llega un atleta que no puede hacer una dominada estricta. La conducta objetivo es la dominada sin kipping por lo que programamos una serie de conductas previas de menor complejidad: agarre isométrico en la barra, dominadas escapulares, ring rows con pies en cajón, dominadas excéntricas, dominadas con gomas (variando la resistencia)…

Cuando el atleta consiga aguantar colgado en la barra más de 30″, se le refuerza; cuando pueda hacer dominadas escapulares con la técnica adecuada se le refuerza y, a medida que continúe progresando, se retiran los refuerzos de las anteriores conductas y se refuerzan las siguientes. A lo largo del proceso se da el feedback negativo o correctivo para evitar movimientos inadecuados y así garantizar que se automaticen los patrones motores deseados (retracción escapular, activación de dorsales y core, etc.)

enseñar crossfit
Nat Díez (@nat10p) en un seminario de CrossFit. Fuente: ikopbphotographer.com

“Si como entrenador no buscas la formación continua, no seas entrenador”

Nat Díez

Al final una de las cosas más gratificantes de enseñar CrossFit es que trasciende muchas veces el plano físico. No sólo perseguimos mejorar la calidad de vida de nuestros atletas sino que también formamos en valores – lo que supone una gran responsabilidad -.

Debemos evitar menoscabar dicha responsabilidad y conformarnos con los conocimientos adquiridos hasta ahora. Nos debemos a nuestros atletas y a nuestra comunidad en tanto que somos representantes de una metodología de base científica que, como tal, exige de un reciclaje continuo por nuestra parte.

No se trata de seguir al pie de la letra unas técnicas conductuales que has leído en un blog o de cambiar radicalmente tu estilo de enseñanza, sino de empaparse de todas las vertientes de conocimiento para ofrecer nuestra mejor versión a los que llegan al box en busca de la suya propia.










Carmona, D., Guzmán, J. F., & Olmedilla, A. (2015). Efectos de un programa de formulación de objetivos y moldeamiento del pase en jóvenes jugadores de fútbol. Revista de psicología del deporte24(1), 81-88.